Legal and Regulatory
Benefits (and Detriments) of Construction Arbitration
Most construction contracts include an alternative dispute resolution clause that requires parties to resolve all disputes by arbitration instead of going to court. What does it mean and is it a good thing?
By J. Gregory Cahill
July 13, 2018
Topics
Legal and Regulatory
by J. Gregory Cahill
J. Gregory Cahill’s practice focuses primarily on complex construction litigation and support for residential and commercial developers and contractors. Mr. Cahill also practices in the areas of insurance litigation and coverage and commercial litigation. He represents builders and developers throughout Arizona, New Mexico and California, including in State and Federal Court and in front of various administrative tribunals and regulatory bodies. He previously practiced in the areas of personal injury and uninsured/underinsured motorist litigation.
Related stories
Legal and Regulatory
The Impact of Nuclear Verdicts on Construction Businesses
By Craig Tappel
In construction, there is no incident too small—but when it comes to litigating them, some verdicts are too big.
Legal and Regulatory
Where Does the FTC's Noncompete Ban Stand?
By Jay Aldis
The FTC's noncompete ban would have taken place one month ago if not for a block from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. As developments continue to unfold behind the scenes, review what this ban could mean for construction companies.
Legal and Regulatory
ABC Urges Negotiations to Restore Operations Following Port Strike
By ABC
Following the ILA strike on the East and Gulf Coasts, ABC issues a statement.