April 2010

Back to Current Issue
Advertisements
Home >> April 2010 >> Developments at DOL

Washington Update

Developments at DOL   

Alexander Passantino



“There’s a new sheriff in town.” For the past year, U.S. Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis has proclaimed this from podiums across America, vowing more aggressive enforcement of federal workplace laws. Yet, despite her promise to “put enforcement back in the Department of Labor,” statistics from the first year of the Obama administration do not indicate a dramatic shift toward enforcement. In fact, in a number of agencies within the Department of Labor (DOL), enforcement appears to have decreased, with lower back wage recoveries than in the final years of the Bush administration.

However, the numbers only tell part of the story. The department, which operated without its chief enforcement officer —the solicitor of labor—for the entire first year, has been on a hiring spree. Last year, Solis hired more than 300 people—including 293 investigators—for the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) alone. One hundred investigators were hired and 33 senior investigators were promoted using funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, with the goal of ensuring “that contractors on stimulus projects funded under the Recovery Act are in compliance with the applicable laws.”

The hiring spree is far from over. This year, WHD plans to hire at least an additional 110 investigators, and the department’s 2011 budget requests authority to hire 90 more investigators. All told, by 2011, WHD intends to have more than 1,000 investigators on staff, an increase of more than 35 percent from 2008 staffing levels. Similar staffing increases can be expected throughout the DOL’s enforcement agencies, as the 2011 budget requests a total of $1.7 billion for workplace enforcement.

The White House Task Force on the Middle Class recently identified an outline of the enforcement and policy agenda:
  • providing “green jobs” training;
  • encouraging the use of project labor agreements;
  • focusing on improper classification of workers as independent contractors;
  • supporting “responsible government contracting” (i.e., “high road” contracting); and
  • advocating the enactment of the Employee Free Choice Act.  
2011 Budget Indicates Priorities
WHD will continue its activities in the government contracting arena, noting the multi-billion dollar federal investment in construction through the Recovery Act will require increased resources to enforce applicable labor laws in the construction industry. The department places a specific emphasis on prevailing wage (i.e., Davis-Bacon) enforcement. Moreover, WHD plans to increase the speed at which it updates prevailing wage determinations under the Davis-Bacon Act, resulting in higher wage rates on government construction projects.

In addition, WHD plans to conduct investigations in connection with the H-2B temporary worker visa program. Under this initiative, WHD will investigate employers that actually use the H-2B program, as well as employers in industries in which non-immigrant workers are likely to be employed. Among the five or six industries identified for targeted investigations are construction, hospitality and landscaping.

Another significant priority is the Joint Department of Labor-Treasury Independent Contractor initiative. This initiative seeks to identify individuals improperly classified as independent contractors and ensure they receive appropriate employment benefits and protections. In addition, the initiative seeks to coordinate federal and state enforcement efforts, as well as prevent or recover losses to the U.S. Treasury and the Social Security, Medicare and Unemployment Insurance Trust Funds resulting from the misclassification of workers.

In addition, the department’s 2011 budget indicates it plans to allocate $11.25 million to provide competitive grants to increase states’ enforcement capacity and to reward the states that are most successful at detecting and prosecuting employers that fail to pay their share of taxes due to improper classification.

An additional $1.6 million and 10 attorneys will be added to pursue misclassification litigation, including multi-state litigation to coordinate enforcement with state agencies. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration will receive $150,000 to modify investigation guidelines to allow its inspectors to identify potential employee misclassification and to share information with WHD.  


Which Employers Will Be Targeted?
WHD notes the misclassification issue is present in several industries, but specifically identifies the construction industry as “rife with employee misclassification.” Accordingly, WHD selected construction as the industry in which it will seek to establish a baseline of compliance. This means the construction industry will face numerous investigations across the country as WHD attempts to gather data to establish the compliance baseline. Of course, a baseline is useless unless it measures future improvements, so the construction industry can expect a similar investigative focus in the coming years.

The newly confirmed Solicitor of Labor M. Patricia Smith developed a reputation for cracking down on improper classification in her previous position as New York’s Labor Commissioner. Smith also was instrumental in the development of the Wage Watch program, in which the New York Department of Labor partnered with community groups—such as the Chinese Staff and Workers’ Association; the Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union; the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1500; and The Workplace Project—to “educate” employers about their responsibilities under wage and hour laws. The Wage Watch program has been criticized due in part to the role the community groups played in the process, including a description of the groups as “enforcers” in at least one document written by a state regulator.

At the national level, the DOL appears to be enlisting the support of labor unions and community organizers to identify potential labor law violations through a program called “We Can Help.” Described as a “national public awareness campaign . . . to inform workers about their rights,” the department states it will encourage advocacy groups and other stakeholders to report labor law violations “through a variety of means.”

The department also intends to increase the use of debarment, civil monetary penalties, liquidated damages and other sanctions against employers found to have violated the law. Recently, the DOL has shown an increased willingness to file suit against employers and a decreased willingness to settle cases unless the employer agrees to substantially higher civil monetary penalties or liquidated damages than would have been mandated in prior years.

Given the consequences of failing to comply with applicable labor and employment laws, employers and contractors should make every effort to review their policies, procedures and practices. It is critical for employers to achieve compliance prior to receiving a visit from a DOL investigator.

In Solis’ words, “there is no excuse for employers who disregard federal labor standards.” Businesses should take her words to heart and get their houses in order before the sheriff comes to town.  


Alexander Passantino is a counselor at Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Washington, D.C., and former acting head of DOL’s Wage and Hour Division. For more information, email apassantino@seyfarth.com.

Print | | |
Search
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Copyright © 1999 - 2012.

All Rights Reserved.
Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) is a national association with 75 chapters representing more than 23,000 merit shop construction and construction-related firms with nearly two million employees. Visit us at www.abc.org.
For more info, email: gotquestions@abc.org. | Privacy Policy | Login